Avoidance learning procedures involve subjects learning that certain aversive events are predicted by specific environmental stimuli. This protocol is for assessing the associative learning and memory of zebrafish.
In the following zebrafish version of the task, fish must learn that a specified visual cue (e.g., blue light, check pattern) predicts an aversive stimulus (e.g., mild electric shock). This type of task is a robust method which assesses associative learning and memory, and it is reported to be impaired in many psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety disorders and schizophrenia and in neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease.
Experimental set up
The Zantiks AD unit is used for avoidance learning in zebrafish. The dividing inserts are used to create four separate testing compartments for tracking four fish in one unit (see image A below).
Metal “shock-plate” inserts are used to deliver the unconditioned stimulus (US+), a mild electric shock, through the water. The plates are placed at both ends of the tank and are designed to be present in each of the 4 arenas (as shown in images A and B below).
The visual stimuli are presented from the integrated screen below the testing tank. The stimuli can be comprised of colour, shapes, stripes, or bitmap images.
Setting up the AD unit for a Pavlovian avoidance learning assay, including arena and shock plate set up and an introduction to a test script outlines how you can lay out the script with the four different periods, habituation, baseline, shock, probe.
Pavlovian avoidance learning is typically divided into three distinct stages.
- Baseline: Fish are initially habituated to the tank for 30 minutes. The two stimuli are presented concurrently, switching sides of the tank every five minutes. During the final 10 minutes of the baseline stage, the fish are tracked to establish baseline preference for the conditioned stimuli (CS). (See the below for preference calculation)
- Conditioning: The CS is paired with a mild electric shock (unconditioned stimulus, US). During nine, consecutive conditioning trials, the non-CS is displayed across the entire screen below the fish for 8.5 sec. The CS was then displayed for 1.5 sec, at the end of which the the brief shock US (9 v DC, 80 ms) is delivered.
- Probe: Immediately following the final CS+US pairing, the CS preference is measured again. The fish is tracked while both stimuli are presented together. (See the below for preference calculation)
During the baseline and probe stages of the aversion learning task, the two stimuli are presented together on the integrated screen below. The use of a checked pattern vs grey colour is illustrated.
Results / data output
The conditioned stimulus preference scores are the main behavioural endpoint analysed in this task. Preference towards the CS is determined in the same manner for both baseline and probe calculations. The proportion of time spent in the area of the CS is calculated for the preference as: Total time in CS / (Time in CS + Time in non-CS).
A decrease in the time spent in the CS can be interpreted that the fish has learned to avoid the environmental stimulus present during the electric shock conditioning. A learned association between the environmental stimulus and the electric shock results in the fish spending less time in that environmental stimulus. The Zantiks AD system can automatically track and provide data analysis on this variable.
The CS preference scores are frequently analysed with independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVAs or two-way repeated measures ANOVAs, depending on the number of factors.
Protocol scripts downloads
Visit our Script library to download scripts to enable you to run this type of experiment on the Zantiks AD system.